Neither government nor community alone: A test of state-centered models of generalized trust.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Robbins, Blaine G.
  • Source:
    Rationality & Society. Aug2011, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p304-346. 43p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      A classic controversy within the institutionalist literature has yet to be resolved. Does the state either render or erode generalized trust? The crowding out perspective contends that trust decays as a result of the state. The political-institutional perspective maintains that the state molds an environment where trust can grow. Using hierarchical generalized linear models with data from the World Values Survey and other sources, this article directly tests these competing arguments and demonstrates strong support for the political-institutional perspective. Although apparatuses of the state — specifically the public allocation of resources and legal property rights institutions — directly and positively influence generalized trust, these effects are not mediated by voluntary associations or income inequality. Instead, this article reveals that property rights institutions moderate and amplify the positive effect of voluntary associations on generalized trust. I discuss the theoretical implications of the results while exploring limitations and avenues for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Rationality & Society is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)