Deception and the Principle of Double Effect.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Source:
    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p471-472. 2p.
  • Document Type:
    Article
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The Principle of Double Effect has been with us since the Middle Ages and has sanctified actions that might otherwise be viewed as morally wrong. What I wish to show in this brief perspective is that an overlooked element in the discussions of this principle raises a serious question about its applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • ISSN:
      0963-1801
    • Accession Number:
      10.1017/S0963180108080602
    • Accession Number:
      34761955
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      Deception and the Principle of Double Effect. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 4, p. 471–472, 2008. DOI 10.1017/S0963180108080602. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=34761955. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Deception and the Principle of Double Effect. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2008;17(4):471-472. doi:10.1017/S0963180108080602
    • APA:
      Deception and the Principle of Double Effect. (2008). Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17(4), 471–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180108080602
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      “Deception and the Principle of Double Effect.” 2008. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4): 471–72. doi:10.1017/S0963180108080602.
    • Harvard:
      ‘Deception and the Principle of Double Effect’ (2008) Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17(4), pp. 471–472. doi: 10.1017/S0963180108080602.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      ‘Deception and the Principle of Double Effect’ 2008, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 471–472, viewed 29 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      “Deception and the Principle of Double Effect.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, vol. 17, no. 4, Oct. 2008, pp. 471–472. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1017/S0963180108080602.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      “Deception and the Principle of Double Effect.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17, no. 4 (October 2008): 471–72. doi:10.1017/S0963180108080602.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Deception and the Principle of Double Effect. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited 2020 Nov 29];17(4):471–2. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=34761955