The republican ideal of freedom as non-domination and the Rojava experiment.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Cemgil, Can
  • Source:
    Philosophy & Social Criticism. May/Jun2016, Vol. 42 Issue 4/5, p419-428. 10p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This article problematizes the republican reliance on contemporary ‘states as they are’ as protectors and guarantors of the republican notion of freedom as non-domination. While the principle of freedom as non-domination constitutes an advance over the liberal principle of freedom as non-interference, its reliance on the national, territorial, legal-technical and extra-economic contemporary state prevents the theoretical uncovering of its full potential. The article argues that to make the most of the principle of freedom as non-domination, a strong Athenian element is required. The democratic confederalist project that is being experimented with by Syrian Kurds in the cantons of Rojava, it is maintained, can contribute theoretically and practically to this republican ideal through its democratic and participatory mechanisms, despite fundamental challenges it has to face. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Philosophy & Social Criticism is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)