Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      Autonomy
      Ethics
      Nanny-state
      Paternalism
      Public health
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: 'Nanny-state' accusations can function as powerful rhetorical weapons against interventions intended to promote public health. Public health advocates often lack effective rebuttals to these criticisms. Nanny-state accusations are largely accusations of paternalism. They conjure up emotive concern about undue governmental interference undermining peoples' autonomy. But autonomy can be understood in various ways. We outline three main conceptions of autonomy, argue that these that can underpin three different conceptions of paternalism, and consider implications for responses to nannystate accusations and the assessment of public health interventions. Study design and methods: Detailed conceptual analysis. Results: The conceptions of paternalism implicit in nanny-state accusations generally depend on libertarian conceptions of autonomy. These reflect unrealistic views of personal independence and do not discriminate sufficiently between trivial and important freedoms. Decisional conceptions of paternalism, like their underlying decisional conceptions of autonomy, have limited applicability in public health contexts. Relational conceptions of paternalism incorporate relational conceptions of autonomy, so recognize that personal autonomy depends on socially shaped skills, self-identities and self-evaluations as well as externally structured opportunities. They encourage attention to the various ways that social interactions and relationships, including disrespect, stigmatization and oppression, can undermine potential for autonomy. While nanny-state accusations target any interference with negative freedom, however trivial, relational conceptions direct concerns to those infringements of negative freedom, or absences of positive freedom, serious enough to undermine self-determination, self-governance and/or self-authorization. Conclusion: Relational conceptions of autonomy and paternalism offer public health policymakers and practitioners a means for rebutting nanny-state accusations, and can support more nuanced and more appropriately demanding appraisals of public health interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Public Health (Elsevier) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • ISSN:
      0033-3506
    • Accession Number:
      10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007
    • Accession Number:
      110689434
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      CARTER, S. M.; ENTWISTLE, V. A.; LITTLE, M. Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions. Public Health (Elsevier), [s. l.], v. 129, n. 8, p. 1021–1029, 2015. DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=110689434. Acesso em: 2 dez. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Carter SM, Entwistle VA, Little M. Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions. Public Health (Elsevier). 2015;129(8):1021-1029. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007
    • APA:
      Carter, S. M., Entwistle, V. A., & Little, M. (2015). Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions. Public Health (Elsevier), 129(8), 1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Carter, S. M., V. A. Entwistle, and M. Little. 2015. “Relational Conceptions of Paternalism: A Way to Rebut Nanny-State Accusations and Evaluate Public Health Interventions.” Public Health (Elsevier) 129 (8): 1021–29. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007.
    • Harvard:
      Carter, S. M., Entwistle, V. A. and Little, M. (2015) ‘Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions’, Public Health (Elsevier), 129(8), pp. 1021–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Carter, SM, Entwistle, VA & Little, M 2015, ‘Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions’, Public Health (Elsevier), vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 1021–1029, viewed 2 December 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Carter, S. M., et al. “Relational Conceptions of Paternalism: A Way to Rebut Nanny-State Accusations and Evaluate Public Health Interventions.” Public Health (Elsevier), vol. 129, no. 8, Aug. 2015, pp. 1021–1029. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Carter, S. M., V. A. Entwistle, and M. Little. “Relational Conceptions of Paternalism: A Way to Rebut Nanny-State Accusations and Evaluate Public Health Interventions.” Public Health (Elsevier) 129, no. 8 (August 2015): 1021–29. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Carter SM, Entwistle VA, Little M. Relational conceptions of paternalism: a way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions. Public Health (Elsevier) [Internet]. 2015 Aug [cited 2020 Dec 2];129(8):1021–9. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=110689434