Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Zellman, Ariel
  • Source:
    Journal of Peace Research. Jul2015, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p492-507. 16p.
  • Document Type:
    Article
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      framing
      Golan Heights
      indivisibility
      Israel
      Jerusalem
      narrative
      territory
      West Bank
    • Abstract:
      International territorial conflicts are frequently characterized by political recourse to narratives of nationalist entitlement, stifling conflict resolution by raising domestic audience costs and discursively limiting bargaining flexibility. Conflict incentivizes elite employment of such claims precisely because security threats and fear of violence heighten popular resonance of adversarial collective identity frames. This article argues, however, that consensus mobilization behind nationalist territorial claims is highly dependent upon the particular narratives elites select to justify them. Employing controlled individual-level experiments administered to diverse populations in Israel, it demonstrates how exposure to competing narratives of homeland, security, economic prosperity, and settlement impacts support for control of East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and the West Bank. Although indivisible claims to 'United Jerusalem', the Golan, and West Bank settlement blocs and strategic highlands are generally considered popular consensus issues in Israel, only particular narratives trigger consensus mobilization behind each. Some narratives even encourage conciliatory policy attitudes against such appeals. As a democracy embroiled in multiple enduring territorial disputes, analysis of the Israeli case contributes to understanding of the limits and political consequences of elite rhetoric. Demonstrating the affinity between narrative frames and popular policy preferences, this article also lends insight into the intersubjective beliefs that drive mass support for nationalist territorial claims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Peace Research is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Full Text Word Count:
      10209
    • ISSN:
      0022-3433
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/0022343314564713
    • Accession Number:
      108594796
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      ZELLMAN, A. Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility. Journal of Peace Research, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 4, p. 492–507, 2015. DOI 10.1177/0022343314564713. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=108594796. Acesso em: 4 dez. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Zellman A. Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility. Journal of Peace Research. 2015;52(4):492-507. doi:10.1177/0022343314564713
    • APA:
      Zellman, A. (2015). Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314564713
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Zellman, Ariel. 2015. “Framing Consensus: Evaluating the Narrative Specificity of Territorial Indivisibility.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (4): 492–507. doi:10.1177/0022343314564713.
    • Harvard:
      Zellman, A. (2015) ‘Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility’, Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), pp. 492–507. doi: 10.1177/0022343314564713.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Zellman, A 2015, ‘Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 492–507, viewed 4 December 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Zellman, Ariel. “Framing Consensus: Evaluating the Narrative Specificity of Territorial Indivisibility.” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 52, no. 4, July 2015, pp. 492–507. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1177/0022343314564713.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Zellman, Ariel. “Framing Consensus: Evaluating the Narrative Specificity of Territorial Indivisibility.” Journal of Peace Research 52, no. 4 (July 2015): 492–507. doi:10.1177/0022343314564713.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Zellman A. Framing consensus: Evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility. Journal of Peace Research [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2020 Dec 4];52(4):492–507. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=hch&AN=108594796